Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeremiah Johnson's avatar

I think this is a rare miss - not because the song should be cancelled, but because the song isn't even as problematic as you're saying it is.

In the context of the time, it's not 'guy is super creepy and the woman is a victim' and more 'guy and girl both want to do it but the girl feels the need to put up token resistance because of social mores'. The 1940s were not a time when a girl could outright say 'Yeah let's get it on' so there was a complicated social dance happening, but both parties in the song know the dance and want what's coming.

The versions I've seen performed live, in that era, were clearly flirtatious from both parties and not predatory. Grisha's post has a good link explaining all this in more detail.

Expand full comment
ronetc's avatar

The other commenters are right and this is wrong: "she clearly doesn’t want to get pursued that night." Quite wrong. The song is a sexual dance to a certain climax, and both partners are enjoying the steps . . . she's just doing hers backwards in high heels.

Expand full comment
111 more comments...

No posts