I Might Be Wrong

I Might Be Wrong

Share this post

I Might Be Wrong
I Might Be Wrong
If Parties Just Said "Suck It: Here's the Nominee", Would That Be Good?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

If Parties Just Said "Suck It: Here's the Nominee", Would That Be Good?

And might it be better if they omitted the "suck it" part?

Jeff Maurer's avatar
Jeff Maurer
Jan 17, 2024
∙ Paid
27

Share this post

I Might Be Wrong
I Might Be Wrong
If Parties Just Said "Suck It: Here's the Nominee", Would That Be Good?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
20
2
Share
Image generated by Dall-E 2 in response to the prompt “a painting of five fat men in suits in the year 1900 smoking cigars”.

Share

Trump scored a big win in the Iowa caucus, and it’s looking like Biden might withstand the Dean Phillips juggernaut. A Biden-Trump rematch is a lot like an Ally McBeal reboot: It looks like it’s going to happen even though nobody seems to want it.

Why is this happening? Matt Yglesias offers an answer to that question (with regards to Biden-Trump, not Ally McBeal) in a recent Slow Boring article called Why the Parties Can’t Decide. In that article, Yglesias summarizes the argument made in an upcoming book about party politics and notes that the parties simply don’t choose nominees anymore. They used to do that, but these days, voters pick the candidates through a series of primaries. Yglesias argues that this contributes to unappealing candidates, since the people who could vet a deep roster of candidates and make a strategic choice — that is, political parties — can’t and don’t do that. Which raises the question: Would it be good if we ditched presidential primaries and just had the parties pick the nominees?

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Jeff Maurer
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More