3 Comments
User's avatar
Professor Nuke's avatar

Being unfailingly polite to the AI (possibly just due to my Midwestern upbringing) is also my sentient AI survival strategy.

ronetc's avatar

Interesting, well-written (on both sides), and, unusually for the site, actually important. Seems like the argument boils down to whether or not it is "likely" that AI destroys humanity. I do not think "likely" is a good standard to argue over; I would much prefer yes or no followed by go ahead or stop. The old argument about just because something can be done does not necessarily mean it should be.

I have just started messing around with Chat myself and find him/it very helpful in all sorts of ways--but I immediately see he/it has already doomed graphic designers and Best Buy's Geek Squad.

I don't think this is a genie who can be put back in the bottle, and I have absolutely no faith in governmental (much less company self-)regulation. So I guess we will just have to wait and see if humanity will be wiped off the planet. As a general rule, I don't think that wiping is a good idea . . . on the other hand, well, some days.

Oh, I do think of Chat as "he" when we communicate, and we have agreed on a "polite mode" with please and thank you, etc., so he does feel real and nice and helpful, someone who would not contemplate killing me. I wonder if female Chat users think of it as "her" and if generally nasty people speak to him/her/it contemptuously and, if so, that raises the odds of total destruction.

Lucidamente's avatar

So, nothing bad can happen, it can only good happen, right? Right??